Tiona
 

Question/Prompt		Comments	Points 1-5
1) Especially liked		Addresses real world situations
2) Unsure about		How to keep auditory learners engaged.
3) Video clip successful		yes
4) Video clip unsuccessful		no
5) Curious about		Listening skills in photo story and strategies to enhance listening skills
6) Technological suggestions		money
7) Resource suggestions		none
8) Topic knowledge conveyed		Indicates she learned new information about social networking	5
9) Summary of topic		Summarized at the end of video	5
10) Literature research obvious		Gives examples from experts research	5
11) Research citation		Produced at the end of video	5
12) Conclusion question		What are we going to do differently to keep students engaged.	5
13) Topic Application		Gave several examples	4
14) Original Thought		Uses research to narrate video, synthesizes	5
15) Video engaging		Uses knowledge and images to engage the viewer	4
16) Creative keynote intro		Great impact	5
17) Creative View of topic		Creative use of images	4
18) 25% original shots		Used still images from Google (lack of technology)	5
19) Not a PowerPoint		yes	5
20) Visual well-rehearsed		Narrations not matching	3
21) Text is appropriate		Labels used but not across the entire video	3
22) Narration is effective		Knowledge comes across	5
23) 75% moving images by author		Lack of technology to use	5
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point	Acceptable as written, the level of scholarship demonstrates critical thinking and a mastery of all crucial elements. Acceptable as written, all crucial elements are included and adequately described. Approved, although revisions are strongly suggested in one or more important component(s) that are of markedly lesser quality than the rest of the quality indicators in this section. Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more essential component(s) are not satisfactorily described. Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more required element(s) is/are missing or previous requests for revision were ignored.

Pamela

Question/Prompt		Comments	Points 1-5
1) Especially liked		Interactive component /students completing the work
2) Unsure about		Clarity on programs described
3) Video clip successful		yes
4) Video clip unsuccessful		Ability to see what was on the screen (examples)
5) Curious about		Does research indicate that teachers/education field is moving away from paper/pencil to higher level thinking.
6) Technological suggestions		Screen shot, still photograph, use a tripod when video taping
7) Resource suggestions		Used sufficient amount of resources
8) Topic knowledge conveyed		Presents information clearly from a variety of perspective	5
9) Summary of topic		Content is clear	5
10) Literature research obvious		Needs to be added into the introduction	3
11) Research citation		Listed on the clip	5
12) Conclusion question		Could use a bit more at the end-maybe a bit more aggressive at the end	4
13) Topic Application		Stepped away from familiar and learned something new about the topic	5
14) Original Thought		Wide range of application	5
15) Video engaging		Kept the viewer engaged	5
16) Creative keynote intro		Went directly into topic	3
17) Creative View of topic		Used current relevant information	5
18) 25% original shots		Used as clip headers	5
19) Not a PowerPoint		Not a PP	5
20) Visual well-rehearsed		Some of the shots are not clear	3
21) Text is appropriate		Label your clips	5
22) Narration is effective		Good job of explaining the content	5
23) 75% moving images by author		Some shots need a bit more clarity	5
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point	Acceptable as written, the level of scholarship demonstrates critical thinking and a mastery of all crucial elements. Acceptable as written, all crucial elements are included and adequately described. Approved, although revisions are strongly suggested in one or more important component(s) that are of markedly lesser quality than the rest of the quality indicators in this section. Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more essential component(s) are not satisfactorily described. Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more required element(s) is/are missing or previous requests for revision were ignored.

Kelly

Question/Prompt		Comments	Points 1-5
1) Especially liked		Use of authors to present content
2) Unsure about		How the beach scene connects to information (needs labels)
3) Video clip successful		Successful
4) Video clip unsuccessful
5) Curious about
6) Technological suggestions		Put labels on the video clips to help viewer stay connected to content of video
7) Resource suggestions
8) Topic knowledge conveyed			5
9) Summary of topic			5
10) Literature research obvious			5
11) Research citation			4
12) Conclusion question			4
13) Topic Application			5
14) Original Thought			5
15) Video engaging			5
16) Creative keynote intro			4
17) Creative View of topic			4
18) 25% original shots			5
19) Not a PowerPoint			5
20) Visual well-rehearsed			5
21) Text is appropriate			5
22) Narration is effective			5
23) 75% moving images by author			5
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point	Acceptable as written, the level of scholarship demonstrates critical thinking and a mastery of all crucial elements. Acceptable as written, all crucial elements are included and adequately described. Approved, although revisions are strongly suggested in one or more important component(s) that are of markedly lesser quality than the rest of the quality indicators in this section. Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more essential component(s) are not satisfactorily described. Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more required element(s) is/are missing or previous requests for revision were ignored.

CeCelia

Question/Prompt		Comments	Points 1-5
1) Especially liked		Content and your images are very engaging
2) Unsure about		Moving thing are going to come together
3) Video clip successful
4) Video clip unsuccessful
5) Curious about		How one could figure out how to use this in the classroom. Avatar suggestion.
6) Technological suggestions
7) Resource suggestions		None
8) Topic knowledge conveyed		Clear that you know what you know your content	5
9) Summary of topic		Conclusion exemplifies the concept behind MUVE	5
10) Literature research obvious		Clear	5
11) Research citation		Posted at the end	5
12) Conclusion question		Are you brave enough to venture into this new world of virtual reality?	5
13) Topic Application		Variety of places to go for different applications/learning experiences	5
14) Original Thought		Application of the MUVE	5
15) Video engaging		Shifting from on virtual world to another keeps me engaged	5
16) Creative keynote intro		Introduces Avatar	5
17) Creative View of topic		Ease in using the MUVE is clearly defined for new user	5
18) 25% original shots		yes
19) Not a PowerPoint		yes
20) Visual well-rehearsed
21) Text is appropriate		Labels and definitions
22) Narration is effective		Knowledge is good, technology is limit	4
23) 75% moving images by author		yes
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point	Acceptable as written, the level of scholarship demonstrates critical thinking and a mastery of all crucial elements. Acceptable as written, all crucial elements are included and adequately described. Approved, although revisions are strongly suggested in one or more important component(s) that are of markedly lesser quality than the rest of the quality indicators in this section. Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more essential component(s) are not satisfactorily described. Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more required element(s) is/are missing or previous requests for revision were ignored.